<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy of Holies Commenting System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eddietejeda.com/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eddietejeda.com/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/</link>
	<description>a researcher, writer and technologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farmer</title>
		<link>http://eddietejeda.com/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nailchipper.com/weblog/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Am a bit late to this but it&#039;s very very cool - I&#039;d love to have something like this to offer edublog users and if I can be of any assistance in playing / testing then just let me know.

And incidentally, if I could advise anything I&#039;d always suggest staying as close to WP as possible - makes for much greater take-up and the ability to leverage other important commenting tools like subscribe to comments / spam blockers and the evolving gravatar stuff... but you already knew that ;)

Great work! Cheers, James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am a bit late to this but it&#8217;s very very cool &#8211; I&#8217;d love to have something like this to offer edublog users and if I can be of any assistance in playing / testing then just let me know.</p>
<p>And incidentally, if I could advise anything I&#8217;d always suggest staying as close to WP as possible &#8211; makes for much greater take-up and the ability to leverage other important commenting tools like subscribe to comments / spam blockers and the evolving gravatar stuff&#8230; but you already knew that <img src='http://eddietejeda.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great work! Cheers, James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shai</title>
		<link>http://eddietejeda.com/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>shai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nailchipper.com/weblog/2006/12/08/holy-of-holies-commenting-system/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>sounds very cool!  i was thinking about this post and i realized there&#039;s another, related widget that might be helpful too: a way to hide/unhide detail in a post.  so for example, i could write a post which says this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Yesterday I stopped by the bookstore. (unhide)

Then I went to the movies. (unhide)

Finally I got some studying done. (unhide)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When you click on the first &quot;unhide&quot;, you see more details, for example:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Yesterday I stopped by the bookstore.  I&#039;ve been trying to decide whether to get &quot;Freakonomics&quot; or &quot;Lapdogs&quot;.  I settled on &quot;Freakonomics&quot; because I liked the cover better. (hide)

Then I went to the movies. (unhide)

Finally I got some studying done. (unhide)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

.. and you can imagine similar expansions for the other &quot;unhide&quot; links.   Clearly, clicking &quot;hide&quot; above will then make the detail on the bookstore visit disappear.

Further, you could imagine nested hides; in the above example, I could include more detail about Freakonomics and what I thought of the book, etc.

It&#039;s easy to see how this could be very useful.  There are many blog posts i&#039;ve seen where the main thrust is obscured by the copious evidence.  You want to see the evidence, of course, but it&#039;s easier to read the general idea first, and then go back for the evidence.  Moreover, I frequently don&#039;t have time for much more than a five sentence synopsis.

So, is something like that in the works?  Or is it already here?  Seems like a useful idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds very cool!  i was thinking about this post and i realized there&#8217;s another, related widget that might be helpful too: a way to hide/unhide detail in a post.  so for example, i could write a post which says this:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Yesterday I stopped by the bookstore. (unhide)</p>
<p>Then I went to the movies. (unhide)</p>
<p>Finally I got some studying done. (unhide)
</p></blockquote>
<p>When you click on the first &#8220;unhide&#8221;, you see more details, for example:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Yesterday I stopped by the bookstore.  I&#8217;ve been trying to decide whether to get &#8220;Freakonomics&#8221; or &#8220;Lapdogs&#8221;.  I settled on &#8220;Freakonomics&#8221; because I liked the cover better. (hide)</p>
<p>Then I went to the movies. (unhide)</p>
<p>Finally I got some studying done. (unhide)
</p></blockquote>
<p>.. and you can imagine similar expansions for the other &#8220;unhide&#8221; links.   Clearly, clicking &#8220;hide&#8221; above will then make the detail on the bookstore visit disappear.</p>
<p>Further, you could imagine nested hides; in the above example, I could include more detail about Freakonomics and what I thought of the book, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to see how this could be very useful.  There are many blog posts i&#8217;ve seen where the main thrust is obscured by the copious evidence.  You want to see the evidence, of course, but it&#8217;s easier to read the general idea first, and then go back for the evidence.  Moreover, I frequently don&#8217;t have time for much more than a five sentence synopsis.</p>
<p>So, is something like that in the works?  Or is it already here?  Seems like a useful idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
